Thursday, January 28, 2010

Kampus UiTM YBK: MB Selangor Tolak Pembangunan?

Soal lokasi di mana kampus UiTM yang diperuntukkan kepada Yayasan Basmi Kemiskinan (YBK) Selangor telah pun di ketahui. Lokasi yang telah diputuskan adalah di Kg. Seri Mendapat, Semujuk, Melaka. Untung orang Melaka. Tahniah kepada Ketua Menterinya yang agresif untuk membawa pembangunan ke negeri berkenaan. Walaupun kecil, tetapi kecil-kecil cili padi.

MB Selangor pula mengakui bahawa keputusan ini tidak akan merugikan Kerajaan Negeri Selangor. Yang rugi adalah rakyat Negeri Selangor. Itulah kenyataan beliau semalam selepas Mesyuarat Exco Kerajaan Negeri. C-bOk melihat kenyataan ini berbentuk ego. MB tidak merasa apa-apa kerana dia pegang jawatan atau tidak, dia tetap kaya. Makan sampai mati pun tak habis. Ahli keluarganya juga pasi sudah terjamin. Dia orang korporat dan telah banyak buat duit. Jadi pembangunan sebuah kampus UiTM di Selangor begitu kecil bagi beliau.

Macam ini punya prinsip pun ada. Prinsip menolak pembangunan kerana keegoan politik. Kenapalah Menteri Besar Selangor dan Kerajaannya menggunakan pendekatan "marahkan nyamuk, kelambu di bakar"? Kerana marahkan YBK dan pendokong-pendokongnya, MB membuat keputusan untuk menolak satu pembangunan kekal yang boleh memberi kesan positif jangka panjang kepada rakyat dan negeri Selangor?

Exco-Exco lain khususnya dari DAP dan PKR, khususnya yang bukan Bumiputra tentulah lagi suka dengan keputusan MB ini. Kerana pembangunan UiTM adalah khusus untuk Bumiputra. Sekiranya program-program untuk Bumiputra di tolak oleh mereka yang berkuasa di Selangor, maka "yang lain" ni tak payah nak susah-susah nak menolak lagi. Sudah ada orang yang boleh menolak untuk mereka.

Rakyat negeri Selangor pula bagaimana? Takkan nak biarkan YBK keseorangan? Betul ke tidak mahu dengan pembangunan?

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

1) umno is now using development money (i.e. rakyat's money, i.e. pakatan supporters and umno supporters and fence sitters' money) to cast a bad light on the selangor government.

2) i admit, it was a catch-22 situation. damned if u do, and damned is u dont.

3) either way, a decision had to be made - however unpopular.

4) it was a correct decision. unpopular, but correct. i stand by tan sri khalid's decision. the risk has been taken, and now it is umno's time to go to town with all sorts of political capialisation on this. umno deserves it. this is (cheap) politics and umno excels in this area.

5) no to ybk, if pakatan is not in the board because it is just another vehicle to enlarge umno's warchest; and another vehicle for those corrupted ybk (read: umno) people to earn some pocket money illegally.

6) ybk says their accounts details are in the web. have u had a look at their accounts?? it could hv been done by a 6-year-old. these things u can bluff the un-educated but not pakatan leaders.

7) who are the ybk people?? some dont know but all pakatan leaders know. they are umno people.

8) generally, it should not matter. but not in this case. these are corrupt umno people. what am i saying here? all umno leaders are corrupt. yes, i make that claim.

9) let's say if pakatan wants to set up an organisation and umno requests to put umno leaders like shahrir samad in the board, pakatan will surely say ok. no problem. shahrir is clean. unfortunately he is still with umno. zaid ibrahim, if he was still in umno, would've been welcomed too.

10) c-bok, i read and re-read your article here. i thougt u were one of those umno-supporters who does not rely (much) on cheap politics meant only to hoodiwnk mat rempits or those poor old makcik/pakcik in the kampungs.

11) but i see now, u r one of them too.

12) u know why tan sri khalid insisted on being in the board of ybk. considering the past antics of the ybk people, u should know the underlying reasons for tan sri's decision.

13) but due to partisan politics, u chose to close one eye and main bantai aje... i expected more from people like u.

14) and this is yet another episode which strengtens my resolve to kuburkan umno. too corrupt. to the core. i know it. u know it too i believe.

15) lastly, if u look at it, it shouldn't matter now. still, our young malay brothers/sisters still get to enjoy another uitm. that is the most important outcome. pakatan rakyat is happy for those soon-to-be students there. the fact that the location now is in another state should not matter. they too are deserving malays. and this is achieved. and this is what pakatan stands for.

4RAKYAT

Zainal A. Kasim said...

Anon 2.03 pm,

1. You have to read my blog througout from the beginning to understand me(sokong tidak semestinya suka dan bangkang tidak semestinya marah);

2. I am not sokong buta or bangkang buta;

3. Thanks for the input/comment